Position statements on infant circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Remove outdated template. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Australia: Add sub-sections. |
||
| Line 323: | Line 323: | ||
== Australia == | == Australia == | ||
===Australasian Association of Paediatric Surgeons=== | |||
According to the [http://www.anzaps.org/paediatric/home Australasian Academy of Paediatric Surgeons]: | According to the [http://www.anzaps.org/paediatric/home Australasian Academy of Paediatric Surgeons]: | ||
| Line 356: | Line 347: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
}} | }} | ||
===Royal Australasian College of Physicians=== | |||
The [https://www.racp.edu.au Royal Australasian College of Physicians] stated in 2010 that the foreskin "exists to protect the glans" and that it is a "primary sensory part of the penis, containing some of the most sensitive areas of the penis."<ref>{{REFweb | |||
|quote= | |||
|url=https://www.racp.edu.au//docs/default-source/advocacy-library/circumcision-of-infant-males.pdf? | |||
|title=Circumcision of infant males | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|publisher=[[RACP]] | |||
|date=2010-09 | |||
|accessdate=2020-06-25 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
See [[Australia]] | See [[Australia]] | ||