Female circumcision: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m wikify FGC, etc.
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m adjusted REFjournal
Line 6: Line 6:


Female genital cutting ([[FGC]]) shares a strikingly similar history to [[circumcision|male circumcision]] in Western medicine, being offered as a way to curb sexual activity, which was thought to cause disease.<ref>[[John Harvey Kellogg|Kellogg, John Harvey]]</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
Female genital cutting ([[FGC]]) shares a strikingly similar history to [[circumcision|male circumcision]] in Western medicine, being offered as a way to curb sexual activity, which was thought to cause disease.<ref>[[John Harvey Kellogg|Kellogg, John Harvey]]</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
|first= Robert Tuttle
  |last=Morris
  |last=Morris
|first=Robert Tuttle
|init=RT
  |title=Is evolution trying to do away with the clitoris?
  |title=Is evolution trying to do away with the clitoris?
  |journal=American Association of OB/GYNs
  |journal=American Association of OB/GYNs
Line 14: Line 15:
  |pages=288-302
  |pages=288-302
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
|last=McFarland
  |first=T. Scott
  |first=T. Scott
  |last=McFarland
  |init=TS
  |title=Circumcision of Girls
  |title=Circumcision of Girls
  |journal=Journal of Orificial Surgery
  |journal=Journal of Orificial Surgery
Line 22: Line 24:
  |pages=31-33
  |pages=31-33
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Dawson
  |first=Benjamin E.
  |first=Benjamin E.
  |last=Dawson
  |init=BE
  |title=Circumcision in the Female: Its Necessity and How to Perform it
  |title=Circumcision in the Female: Its Necessity and How to Perform it
  |journal=American Journal of Clinical Medicine
  |journal=American Journal of Clinical Medicine
Line 31: Line 34:
  |pages=520-525
  |pages=520-525
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Eskridge
  |first=Belle C.
  |first=Belle C.
  |last=Eskridge
  |init=BC
  |title=Why not circumcise the girl as well as the boy?
  |title=Why not circumcise the girl as well as the boy?
  |journal=Texas State Journal of Medicine
  |journal=Texas State Journal of Medicine
Line 39: Line 43:
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=McDonald
  |last=McDonald
  |first=C.F.
  |init=CF
  |title=Circumcision of the female
  |title=Circumcision of the female
  |journal=General Practitioner
  |journal=General Practitioner
Line 47: Line 51:
  |pages=98-99
  |pages=98-99
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
|first=W.G.
  |last=Rathmann
  |last=Rathmann
  |title=[http://www.noharmm.org/femcirctech.htm Female Circumcision: Indications and a new Technique]
|init=WG
  |title=Female Circumcision: Indications and a new Technique
|url=http://www.noharmm.org/femcirctech.htm
  |journal=General practitioner
  |journal=General practitioner
  |volume=20
  |volume=20
Line 98: Line 103:
  |last=MacReady
  |last=MacReady
  |first=Norra
  |first=Norra
|init=N
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |journal=The Lancet
  |journal=The Lancet
Line 113: Line 119:
  |last=MacReady
  |last=MacReady
  |first=Norra
  |first=Norra
|init=N
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |journal=The Lancet
  |journal=The Lancet
Line 146: Line 153:
  |last=MacReady
  |last=MacReady
  |first=Norra
  |first=Norra
|init=N
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |journal=The Lancet
  |journal=The Lancet
Line 194: Line 202:
  |last=MacReady
  |last=MacReady
  |first=Norra
  |first=Norra
|init=N
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |journal=The Lancet
  |journal=The Lancet
Line 209: Line 218:
  |last=MacReady
  |last=MacReady
  |first=Norra
  |first=Norra
|init=N
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |journal=The Lancet
  |journal=The Lancet
Line 224: Line 234:
  |last=MacReady
  |last=MacReady
  |first=Norra
  |first=Norra
|init=N
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |journal=The Lancet
  |journal=The Lancet
Line 239: Line 250:
  |last=MacReady
  |last=MacReady
  |first=Norra
  |first=Norra
|init=N
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |journal=The Lancet
  |journal=The Lancet
Line 254: Line 266:
  |last=MacReady
  |last=MacReady
  |first=Norra
  |first=Norra
|init=N
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
  |journal=The Lancet
  |journal=The Lancet
Line 272: Line 285:
[[FGC]] consists of several distinct procedures. Their severity is often viewed as dependent on how much genital tissue is cut away. The [[WHO]] — which uses the term Female Genital Mutilation ([[FGM]]) — divides the procedure into four major types<ref name = "WHO - Terminology"/> (see Diagram 1), although there is some debate as to whether all common forms of FGM fit into these four categories, as well as issues with the reliability of reported data.<ref name="Elmusharaf_2006">{{REFjournal
[[FGC]] consists of several distinct procedures. Their severity is often viewed as dependent on how much genital tissue is cut away. The [[WHO]] — which uses the term Female Genital Mutilation ([[FGM]]) — divides the procedure into four major types<ref name = "WHO - Terminology"/> (see Diagram 1), although there is some debate as to whether all common forms of FGM fit into these four categories, as well as issues with the reliability of reported data.<ref name="Elmusharaf_2006">{{REFjournal
  |last=Elmusharaf
  |last=Elmusharaf
  |first=S.
  |init=S
|first2=N.
  |last2=Elhadi
  |last2=Elhadi
  |first3=L.
  |init2=N
  |last3=Almroth
  |last3=Almroth
|init3=L
  |title=Reliability of self reported form of female genital mutilation and WHO classification: cross sectional study
  |title=Reliability of self reported form of female genital mutilation and WHO classification: cross sectional study
  |journal=BMJ
  |journal=BMJ