Difference between revisions of "South Korea"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Revise text.)
(Add section on medical research.)
Line 35: Line 35:
  
  
 +
==Medical research==
  
 +
Kim & Pang (2007) studied the effect of the [[foreskin]] on [[masturbation]]. Theyreported that masturbatory pleasure decreased in 48% of the respondents and increased in 8%, while difficulty increased in 63% but was easier in 37%. They concluded that there was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure after circumcision.<ref name="kimpang2007">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=DaiSik
 +
|first=Kim
 +
|init=K
 +
|last2=Pang
 +
|first2=Myung-Geol
 +
|init2=MG
 +
|title=The effect of male circumcision on sexuality
 +
|journal=BJU Int
 +
|volume=99
 +
|issue=3
 +
|pages=619-622
 +
|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06646.x
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=17155977
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06646.x
 +
|date=2007-03
 +
|accessdate=2021-06-06
 +
}}</ref>
  
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}

Revision as of 23:16, 6 June 2021

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

South Korea, a traditionally non-circumcising nation, nevertheless, adopted the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision during and after the Korean War (1950-53). The adoption of circumcision may be traced to 1950, when the United States intervened in the Korean War and large numbers of mostly circumcised American troops were sent into South Korea to aid in its defense.[1]


Medical research

Kim & Pang (2007) studied the effect of the foreskin on masturbation. Theyreported that masturbatory pleasure decreased in 48% of the respondents and increased in 8%, while difficulty increased in 63% but was easier in 37%. They concluded that there was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure after circumcision.[2]

References

  1. REFjournal Kim DS, Lee JY, Pang MG. Male circumcision: a South Korean perspective. BJU Int. January 1999; 83 Suppl 1: 28-33. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 6 June 2021.
  2. REFjournal DaiSik K, Pang MG. The effect of male circumcision on sexuality. BJU Int. March 2007; 99(3): 619-622. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 6 June 2021.