Netherlands: Difference between revisions

Conclusion: Revise text.
Line 203: Line 203:
==Conclusion==
==Conclusion==


Non-therapeutic circumcision of boys has not received financial support from the government in the Netherlands since 2004.
Non-therapeutic circumcision of boys has not received financial support from the government in the Netherlands since 2004. Parents in the Netherlands who want to have a boy circumcised are free to do so, but must pay out-of-pocket for the service.
 
The government has ratified treaties that require protection of the children's rights which are offended by non-therapeutic child circumcision, however boys are not protected while girls receive protection. This clearly is discrimination on the basis of gender and a general failure to support human rights treaty obligations.
 
Parents in the Netherlands who want to have a boy circumcised are free to do so, but must pay out-of-pocket for the service.


The government has ratified treaties that require protection of the children's rights which are offended by non-therapeutic child circumcision, however boys are not protected while girls receive protection. This clearly is discrimination on the basis of gender and a general failure to support human rights treaty obligations. The government has failed to exercise its duty to protect and care for the physical integrity of boys.
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Royal Dutch Medical Association]]
* [[Royal Dutch Medical Association]]