Urethral injury: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Create page. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Case report: Add case report. |
||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
==Case report== | ==Case report== | ||
Limaye & Hancock (1968) reported the case of a seven-year-old caucasian boy who presented with a supposed case of "hypospadias". The boy had been circumcised on the third day of life. Upon examination the supposed "hypospadias" was discovered to be urethral fistula, sufficiently large to allow the passage of probe into the meatus and out through the fistula. A surgical repair was successful.<ref name=limaye1968">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Limaye | |||
|first=Ramesh D. | |||
|init= | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2=Hancock | |||
|first2=Reginald A. | |||
|init2= | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|last3= | |||
|first3= | |||
|init3= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Penile urethral fistula as a complication of circumcision | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=J. Pediatr | |||
|location= | |||
|date=1989 | |||
|volume=72 | |||
|issue=1 | |||
|article= | |||
|page= | |||
|pages=105-6 | |||
|url= | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=5634930 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI=10.1016/s0022-3476(68)80410-x | |||
|accessdate=2022-03-05 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||