Penile frostbite: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''

'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a genital [[skin]] [[injury]].

== Definition ==

Line 132:

== Penile frostbite ==

This term is not commonly used in relation to the [[penis]] or [[foreskin]]. It emerged in early 2023 because Prince Harry, the Duke of ~~Wales~~, used the term in his book ''Reserve''. In it he falsely claims "that the chance of getting penile frostbite is much greater if you’re not circumcised" which not only is unproven but also unlogical, because the [[foreskin]] protects the [[glans]] from frostbite, like it does protect it from faeces and urine during the diaper era of newborns and other harmful influences later.<ref>{{REFweb

This term is not commonly used in relation to the [[penis]] or [[foreskin]]. It emerged in early 2023 because Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, used the term in his book ''Reserve''. In it he falsely claims "that the chance of getting penile frostbite is much greater if you’re not circumcised" which not only is unproven but also unlogical, because the [[foreskin]] protects the [[glans]] from frostbite, like it does protect it from faeces and urine during the diaper era of newborns and other harmful influences later.<ref>{{REFweb

|url=https://pagesix.com/2023/01/05/prince-harry-reveals-whether-hes-circumcised-in-bombshell-spare-memoir/

|title=Prince Harry reveals whether he’s circumcised in bombshell ‘Spare’ memoir

Line 139:

|date=2023-01-05

|accessdate=2023-01-26

}}</ref><ref>{{REFnews

|url=https://nypost.com/2023/01/06/prince-harry-ripped-over-frostbitten-penis-bombshell/

|title=Internet roasts Prince Harry over ‘frostbitten penis’ reveal

|last=Cost

|first=Ben

|date=2023-01-06

|accessdate=2023-01-09

|publisher=New York Post

}}</ref>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''
+'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a genital [[skin]] [[injury]].
 == Definition ==
@@ Line 132: / Line 132: @@
 == Penile frostbite ==
-This term is not commonly used in relation to the [[penis]] or [[foreskin]]. It emerged in early 2023 because Prince Harry, the Duke of Wales, used the term in his book ''Reserve''. In it he falsely claims "that the chance of getting penile frostbite is much greater if you’re not circumcised" which not only is unproven but also unlogical, because the [[foreskin]] protects the [[glans]] from frostbite, like it does protect it from faeces and urine during the diaper era of newborns and other harmful influences later.<ref>{{REFweb
+This term is not commonly used in relation to the [[penis]] or [[foreskin]]. It emerged in early 2023 because Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, used the term in his book ''Reserve''. In it he falsely claims "that the chance of getting penile frostbite is much greater if you’re not circumcised" which not only is unproven but also unlogical, because the [[foreskin]] protects the [[glans]] from frostbite, like it does protect it from faeces and urine during the diaper era of newborns and other harmful influences later.<ref>{{REFweb
   |url=https://pagesix.com/2023/01/05/prince-harry-reveals-whether-hes-circumcised-in-bombshell-spare-memoir/
   |title=Prince Harry reveals whether he’s circumcised in bombshell ‘Spare’ memoir
@@ Line 139: / Line 139: @@
   |date=2023-01-05
   |accessdate=2023-01-26
+}}</ref><ref>{{REFnews
+ |url=https://nypost.com/2023/01/06/prince-harry-ripped-over-frostbitten-penis-bombshell/
+ |title=Internet roasts Prince Harry over ‘frostbitten penis’ reveal
+ |last=Cost
+ |first=Ben
+ |date=2023-01-06
+ |accessdate=2023-01-09
+ |publisher=New York Post
 }}</ref>