London v. Glasser et al.: Difference between revisions

Add text and citation.
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Construction Site}}
{{Construction Site}}
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a lawsuit that was filed in the [https://www.marin.courts.ca.gov/ Superior Court of the State of California, County of Marin], California in the 1980s by Trulie London on behalf of her minor son, Adam London, against Mark Glasser, an individual, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, a corporation, Permanente Medical Group regarding consent for the circumcision of infant Adam London. The plaintiff was represented by Richard W. Morris.<ref name="morris1989">{{REFjournal
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a lawsuit that was filed in the [https://www.marin.courts.ca.gov/ Superior Court of the State of California, County of Marin], California in the 1980s by Trulie London on behalf of her minor son, Adam London, against defendants Mark Glasser, an individual, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, a corporation, Permanente Medical Group regarding consent for the circumcision of infant Adam London. The plaintiff was represented by Richard W. Morris.<ref name="morris1989">{{REFjournal
  |last=Morris
  |last=Morris
  |init=RW
  |init=RW
Line 24: Line 24:
A petition for review was filed with the [https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/ California Supreme Court], however it was denied.<ref name="morris1989" />
A petition for review was filed with the [https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/ California Supreme Court], however it was denied.<ref name="morris1989" />


Although federal issues were involved that would support an appeal to United States Supreme Court, financial issues prevented further appeal.<ref name="morris1989" />
Although federal issues were involved that would support an appeal to [https://www.supremecourt.gov/ United States Supreme Court], financial issues prevented further appeal.<ref name="morris1989" />


{{REF}}
{{REF}}