London v. Glasser et al.: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Add comment; remove Construction Site template.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Construction Site}}
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a lawsuit that was filed in the [https://www.marin.courts.ca.gov/ Superior Court of the State of California, County of Marin], California in the 1980s by Trulie London on behalf of her minor son, Adam London, against defendants Mark Glasser, an individual, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, a corporation, Permanente Medical Group regarding consent for the circumcision of infant Adam London. The plaintiff was represented by Richard W. Morris.<ref name="morris1989">{{REFjournal
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a lawsuit that was filed in the [https://www.marin.courts.ca.gov/ Superior Court of the State of California, County of Marin], California in the 1980s by Trulie London on behalf of her minor son, Adam London, against defendants Mark Glasser, an individual, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, a corporation, Permanente Medical Group regarding consent for the circumcision of infant Adam London. The plaintiff was represented by Richard W. Morris.<ref name="morris1989">{{REFjournal
  |last=Morris
  |last=Morris
Line 25: Line 24:


Although federal issues were involved that would support an appeal to [https://www.supremecourt.gov/ United States Supreme Court], financial issues prevented further appeal.<ref name="morris1989" />
Although federal issues were involved that would support an appeal to [https://www.supremecourt.gov/ United States Supreme Court], financial issues prevented further appeal.<ref name="morris1989" />
 
== Comment by Intactiwiki ==
Many observers believe this case was wrongly decided. It may be that this case was ahead of its time and would fare better if presented today.
{{LINKS}}
* {{REFweb
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/legal/
|title=Circumcision: Legal Issues
|last=Hill
|first=
|init=G
|publisher=Circumcision Reference Library
|date=2013
|accessdate=2023-10-26
}}
{{REF}}
{{REF}}