Royal Australasian College of Physicians: Difference between revisions

Revise link.
Revise citation.
Line 16: Line 16:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


The RACP has declined to recommend non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys.<ref name="racp2010">{{REFdocument
The RACP had declined to recommend non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys in its now replaced 2010 statement.<ref name="racp2010">{{REFdocument
  |title=Circumcision of Infant Males
  |title=Circumcision of Infant Males
  |url=https://www.racp.edu.au//docs/default-source/advocacy-library/circumcision-of-infant-males.pdf?sfvrsn=eaa32f1a_10
  |url=
  |contribution=
  |contribution=
  |last=
  |last=Anonymous
  |first=
  |first=
  |publisher=The Royal Australasian College of Physicians
  |publisher=The Royal Australasian College of Physicians
Line 34: Line 34:
  |date=2022-12
  |date=2022-12
  |last=[[RACP]]
  |last=[[RACP]]
|format=PDF
  |accessdate=2023-06-07
  |accessdate=2023-06-07
}}</ref> as of December 2022 states:
}}</ref> as of December 2022 states:
Line 64: Line 65:
* [[Circumcision study flaws]]
* [[Circumcision study flaws]]
* [[New Zealand]]
* [[New Zealand]]
{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}
* {{URLwebsite|https://www.racp.edu.au/|2023-11-17}}
* {{URLwebsite|https://www.racp.edu.au/|2023-11-17}}