Difference between revisions of "Psychological literature about male circumcision"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (→Articles: Add reference.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m (→Introduction) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|scope= | |scope= | ||
|location=Volume 13 | |location=Volume 13 | ||
| − | |paages | + | |paages=1-161 |
|publisher= | |publisher= | ||
|ISBN= | |ISBN= | ||
| − | |accessdate=2024- | + | |accessdate=2024-06-22 |
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFjournal | * {{REFjournal | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
|volume=10 | |volume=10 | ||
|pages=90-3 | |pages=90-3 | ||
| − | |accessdate=2024-06- | + | |accessdate=2024-06-22 |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 19:11, 22 June 2024
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
This page collects and indexes psychological literature about male circumcision.
Work in progress: The following information does not claim to be complete. More content will be added gradually.
Introduction
The circumcision industry would like parents and the public to believe that circumcision is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of informed consent typically excludes any discussion of the psychological trauma, injury, and effects of circumcision.
Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.
Articles
Freud, Sigmund (1913): Totem and Taboo, Standard Edition. Volume 13 Retrieved 22 June 2024.
Glover E. The ‘screening’ function of traumatic memories. Int J Psychoanal. 1 January 1929; 10: 90-3. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
