New Zealand: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m reformattings
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m updated REFbook parameters
Line 2: Line 2:


The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic medically unnecessary circumcision in New Zealand rose to about 95 percent in the 1940s. The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision started to decline about 1950. It was reported at 0.35 percent among white New Zealanders in 1995.<ref>{{REFbook
The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic medically unnecessary circumcision in New Zealand rose to about 95 percent in the 1940s. The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision started to decline about 1950. It was reported at 0.35 percent among white New Zealanders in 1995.<ref>{{REFbook
  | last=McGrath, Ken, and Hugh Young
  |last=McGrath
  | first=
|first=Ken
  | year=2001
|last2=Young
  | title=Review of Circumcision in New Zealand
  |first2=Hugh
  | url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_8 A
  |year=2001
  | work=
  |title=Review of Circumcision in New Zealand
  | editor=George C. Denniston, Frederick Mansfield Hodges, and Marilyn Fayre Milos
  |url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_8 A
  | edition=
  |work=
  | volume=
  |editor=George C. Denniston, Frederick Mansfield Hodges, and Marilyn Fayre Milos
  | chapter=Understanding Circumcision
  |edition=
  | pages=129-146
  |volume=
  | location=New York
  |chapter=Understanding Circumcision
  | publisher=Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
  |pages=129-146
  | isbn=
  |location=New York
  | quote=
  |publisher=Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
  | accessdate=2019-09-27
  |isbn=
  | note=
  |quote=
  |accessdate=2019-09-27
  |note=
}}</ref>  
}}</ref>