Circumcision study flaws

From IntactiWiki
Revision as of 22:42, 29 July 2020 by WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text.)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

The Circumcision study flaws are numerous. The medical literature relating to circumcision is impacted by religious and cultural views of many authors. Moreover the circumcision status of the author impacts his views.[1]


Polarity

The medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized. Foreskinned doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while circumcised doctors tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.[1]

References

  1. a b REFjournal Hill, G.. The case against circumcision. J Mens Health Gend. 20 August 2007; 4(3): 318-323.