Arguments pro circumcision

Pro circumcision activists have many arguments why the medically not indicated Circumcision should make sense. This page tries to offer an almost complete list and a ranking of the pro arcuments. All arguments listed hereafter can be and already have been refuted, the religious arguments included.

Contents

Religious Arguments

Jewish Religion

• "Circumcision is required by God."

  This argument is brought by the Jewish communities, with respect to a Bible text where God ordered the Israelic forefather Abraham to have all male descendants circumcised. But in fact it is not a religion-giving, but a religion-confirming ritual act that can therefore be postponed to a later date without any problem.

• "Only the circumcision makes a boy a real Jew."

  Refutation: In the Jewish-religious culture, a boy becomes a Jew automatically when he is born by a Jewish mother.

Islamic Religion

• "Circumcision has been recommended by the Prophet Mohammed."

  This argument is brought by the Muslim communities, with respect to a Sunna text of the prophet where the male circumcision is required.

Trivializing arguments

• "I've never heard anyone complain about being circumcised."

  Chances are that a man does not talk about his sexual or other (genital) issues to others at all. There are many personal stories of men who did and do complain. There is an organization named Men Do Complain, there are books with case histories of many men who do complain. Oh, wait, I myself have never heard anyone complain about being beaten by his parents. But that doesn't legalize corporal punishment at all, doesn't it?

• "Circumcision is similar to removing a patch."

  All published circumcision videos show that those who are circumcised without adequate anaesthetic treatment (anaesthesia or anaesthetic), suffer immense pain. Infants fall regularly in shock as a reaction to the pain, when being circumcised without effective anaestesia.

• "Babies feel no pain yet, therefore should be circumcised at an early stage."

  This assertion is completely obsolete and refuted in many studies. In the mother's womb, children already feel pain, and even more directly after birth.

• "Circumcisionis comparable with ear piercing or other piercings."

  Usually any sensitive tissue or even functional body parts remove earlobes and piercings. Also earlobes and piercing holes can grow again. Therefore, this comparison is completely untenable.

• "Circumcision is like cutting fingernails or hair."

  Fingernails and hair grow by themselves. This trivializing comparison of foreskin amputation with normal personal hygiene is untenable.

Medical Prophylactical Arguments

• Circumcision supposedly protects against HIV/AIDS.
• Circumcision supposedly protects against STDs.

  People refer over and over again to a study of the WHO which should have determined that circumcision should have a 60% protection against HIV/AIDS. This study is sharply criticized worldwide by experts.

• Circumcision supposedly protects against urinary tract infections (HTI).
• Circumcision supposedly protects against penis cancer.
• Circumcision supposedly protects against cervical cancer / HPV.

  The aforementioned diseases were mentioned during the modern history of circumcision to somehow justify non-medical circumcision medically. For prevention of the diseases mentioned however, other non-destructive measures (such as hygiene, condoms, etc.) are more appropriate. America with the highest circumcision rate of all western countries has also still the highest HIV / AIDS rate in all Western countries.

• Circumcision supposedly protects against phimosis.

  There are actually medically indicated cases of phimosis. But more than 90% of them can be corrected without surgery.

Hygienical Arguments

• "A circumcised penis can be cleaned much easier."

  The cleaning of an intact or circumcised penis is equal and is not hampered by an intact foreskin.

• "Uncircumcised penisses always smell."

  This argument assumes a flat rate poor hygiene for all intact boys and men and thus constitutes an indirect insult all intact boys and men.

Esthetical Arguments

• "A circumcised penis looks nicer."

  That is not a valid measure of circumcision on children. With the same aesthetic argument, for example, Chinese girls feet were fueled in former times, so they could barely walk as adult women because of the deformation of the feet.

Sexual Arguments

• "Circumcised men can cum later."

  In fact, many circumcised men have to work much longer for ejaculation, especially with age, because due to the lack of foreskin their glans is increasingly callous and unfeeling.

Moral Arguments

• "I want to keep my boy from masturbating."

  Masturbation is something completely natural and part of the right to sexual self-determination. The excessive fight against the natural masturbation was the main motivation for the american doctor and rassist John Harvey Kellogg to propagate circumcision all over the United States of America.

See also

• Circumpendium: Non-medical indications for circumcision