Changes

}}</ref> Dave ''et al''. (2003) reported that men without foreskins "were more likely to report having had homosexual partner(s) (7.5% v 5.3%, p =0.012) and partners from abroad (19.7% v 13.1%, p...0.001)."<ref name="dave2003">{{REFjournal |last=Dave |first=SS |author-link= |last2=Johnson |first2=AM |author2-link= |last3=Fenton |first3=KA |author3-link= |last4=Mercer |first4=CH |author4-link= |last5=Erens |first5=B |author5-link= |last6=Wellings |first6=K |author6-link= |last7= |first7= |author7-link= |last8= |first8= |author8-link= |last9= |first9= |author9-link= |etal=no |title=Male circumcision in Britain: findings from a national probability sample survey |trans-title= |language= |journal=Sex Trans Infect |location= |date=2003-12 |volume=79 |issue= |pages=499-500 |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/general/dave1/ |quote= |pubmedID=14663134 |pubmedCID=1744763 |DOI=10.1136/sti.79.6.499 |accessdate=2019-10-29}}</ref> Cold & Taylor (1999) commented, "The increased frequency of [[masturbation]], anal intercourse and fellatio reported by circumcised men in the USA may possibly be due to the sensory imbalance caused by circumcision. Clearly, amputation of the prepuce causes changes in sexual behaviour in human males and females.<ref name="cold-taylor1999" />