17,150
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
'''Florian's lawsuit'''
* 47:03: Back to Florian. He is shown in front of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, where his lawsuit is ultimately dismissed in the second instance. The circumcising doctor would have done everything right. "The plaintiff was unable to prove that the diagnosis made was incorrectincorrectly. There were also no proven medical errors and the duty to provide information was not breached." This verdict is surprising because Florian's mother was never informed about alternative methods.
* 49:14: The medical lawyer Prof. [[Jörg Scheinfeld]], who accompanied the trial, found that children's interests are often evaluated differently in court than the interests of adults. It is incomprehensible to Florian that the doctor was allowed to circumcise him at the time, even though he was symptom-free.
'''New guidelines for phimosis, requirements, conclusion'''