Illinois - Judge says no to circumcision
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy is the headline used by the New York Times on 25 October 2006 for a report on the historic Schmidt v. Niznik case in Chicago, Illinois in which the court prohibited the circumcision of boy until he is old enough to decide for himself.
See also
External links
(19 February 2006)."Circumcision dispute lands in Illinois court", http://usatoday30.usatoday.com, USA Today. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
Quote:A clash over of their son's circumcision has landed the parents of an eight-year-old Illinois boy in a U.S. court where there is no apparent precedent.
- Peres, Judy (25 October 2006)."Court bans forcing boy's circumcision", www.chicagotribune.com, Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
Quote:Because there are no U.S. precedents, other courts could look to this ruling in future cases, said George Hill of Doctors Opposing Circumcision.
- (25 October 2006)."Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy", www.nytimes.com/, New York Times. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
- Roe, Michael (26 October 2006)."An Example of Joint Custody Medical Decisions", Illinois Divorce Law Blog. Retrieved 6 June 2020.