Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Alleged reasons for circumcision

2 bytes removed, 13:06, 26 November 2021
m
adjusted REF
In 1966, Masters and Johnson erroneous claim that there is no difference in sensitivity between penises with and without foreskin.
: ({{NOTE}} Their work helps propagate the medical dogma that circumcision has no effect on sexuality go practically unquestioned for nearly the next four decades.)<ref name="MastersJohnson1966">{{REFbook
|last=Masters and & Johnson
|year=1966
|title=Human Sexual Response
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,208
edits

Navigation menu