22,208
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
fixed wiki link
The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.
[[Peter W. Adler|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision is a Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent medical indication.
== Guessed reasons for his engagement ==