Difference between revisions of "Illinois - Judge says no to circumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (format.)
(Add text.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Construction Site}}
 
{{Construction Site}}
 +
 +
'''Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy''' is the headline used by the ''New York Times'' on 25 October 2006 for a report on the historic Schmidt v. Niznik case in Chicago, Illinois in which the court prohibited the circumcision of boy until he is old enough to decide for himself.
  
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
{{SEEALSO}}
Line 34: Line 36:
 
}}
 
}}
  
* http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/25/us/25brfs-003.html?_r=1&
+
* {{REFnews
 +
|title=Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy
 +
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/25/us/25brfs-003.html?_r=1&
 +
|last=
 +
|first=
 +
|coauthors=
 +
|publisher=New York Times
 +
|website=www.nytimes.com/
 +
|date=2006-10-25
 +
|accessdate=2020-06-06
 +
|quote=
 +
}}
  
 
* {{REFnews
 
* {{REFnews

Revision as of 01:18, 7 June 2020

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy is the headline used by the New York Times on 25 October 2006 for a report on the historic Schmidt v. Niznik case in Chicago, Illinois in which the court prohibited the circumcision of boy until he is old enough to decide for himself.

See also

External links


  • REFnews Peres, Judy (25 October 2006)."Court bans forcing boy's circumcision", www.chicagotribune.com, Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
    Quote: Because there are no U.S. precedents, other courts could look to this ruling in future cases, said George Hill of Doctors Opposing Circumcision.