Changes

{{Construction Site}}'''Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy''' is the headline used by the ''New York Times'' on 25 October 2006 for a report on the historic, precedent-setting Schmidt v. Niznik case in Chicago, Illinois in which the court prohibited the [[circumcision]] of a boy until he is old enough to decide for himself. The case represented a victory for the [[genital autonomy]] movement. The case generated substantial media comment.

* {{REFnews |title=Circumcision dispute lands in Illinois court |url=http://wwwusatoday30.nytimesusatoday.com/2006news/10health/25/us/25brfs2006-02-19-003circumcision_x.html?_rhtm |last= |first= |coauthors= |publisher=1&USA Today* |website=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/ |date=2006-02-19 |accessdate=2020-circumcision_x06-06 |quote=A clash over of their son's circumcision has landed the parents of an eight-year-old Illinois boy in a U.S. court where there is no apparent precedent.htm}}* {{REFnews |title=Court bans forcing boy's circumcision |url=http://wwwarticles.illinoisdivorcelawyerblogchicagotribune.com/2006-10-25/news/0610250034_1_circumcision-boy-custodial |last=Peres |first=Judy |coauthors= |publisher=Chicago Tribune |website=www.chicagotribune.com |date=2006-10/an_example_of_joint_custody_me-25 |accessdate=2020-06-06 |quote=Because there are no U.S. precedents, other courts could look to this ruling in future cases, said [[George Hill]] of [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]].html}}* {{REFnews |title=Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy |url=http://articleswww.nytimes.com/2006/10/25/us/25brfs-003.html?_r=1& |last= |first= |coauthors= |publisher=New York Times |website=www.chicagotribunenytimes.com/ |date=2006-10-25/news/0610250034_1_circumcision |accessdate=2020-06-06 |quote=The judge, Jordan Kaplan of Circuit Court in Cook County, said that the procedure was “an extraordinary medical procedure” for a 9-year-old and that the boy-custodialcould decide for himself when he turned 18.}}