Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

PEPFAR

4,232 bytes added, 12:33, 29 November 2022
m
removed blank line
[[Image:PEPFAR.png|right|thumb|PEPFAR]]
The '''President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief''' ('''PEPFAR''') is a United States governmental initiative to address the global [[HIV]] epidemic and help save the lives of those suffering from the disease. Launched by U.S. President George W. Bush in 2003on the advice of [[Anthony Fauci]], PEPFAR has provided more than $85 billion in cumulative funding for [[HIV]]/[[AIDS]] treatment, prevention, and research since its inception, making it the largest global health program focused on a single disease in history.
PEPFAR has begun providing money (United States tax dollars) for male circumcision programs.<ref>{{REFweb
}}</ref> Focus countries have been invited to request program funding to increase access to the procedure.
PEPFAR ignominiously ended the provision of non-therapeutic [[circumcision ]] of boys under age 15 in November 2019 due to significant , complications, injuries, and other abuses and complications.
==Reimagining PEPFAR's Strategic Direction==
This document, ''Reimagining PEPFAR's Strategic Direction'', published in September 2022, provides new directions for PEPFAR's fight against the ''HIV'' pandemic. The document is entirely silent on male and female circumcision, although male circumcision was the cornerstone of the previous effort to prevent HIV infection and PEPFAR formerly proudly trumpeted the 27,700,000+ circumcisions (AKA genital mutilations) in Africa that it had sponsored. It is unclear if PEPFAR will continue to promote circumcision, which has been demonstrated to be ineffective.<ref name="reimagining2022">{{REFdocument
|title=Reimagining PEPFAR's Strategic Directio
|url=https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/PEPFAR-Strategic-Direction_FINAL.pdf
|contribution=
|last=
|first=
|publisher=U.S. Department of State
|format=PDF
|date=2022-09
|accessdate=2022-11-28
}}</ref>
<!--
== World AIDS Day (2010) Announcements ==
}}
Note that the 60% is a relative risk reduction (absolute risk reduction 1.31%) during 18 months - not life-long.<ref name="boyle2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref>-->
== Swaziland ==
|date=2011-03-04
|publisher=Science Speaks: HIV & TB News
|quote=The Ministry of Health, supported principally by [[UNICEF ]] and [[PEPFAR]], is currently working to introduce and scale up neonatal circumcision.
|accessdate=2011-05-06
}}</ref>
==RCTs shown to be erroneous==
Boyle & Hill (2011) established conclusively that the randomized controlled trials had disabling methodological and statistical flaws that invalidated their findings,<ref name="boyle2011" >{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref> therefore the PEPFAR VMMC program is based on false information. [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]] & Storms (2011) correctly forecast that institution of a circumcision program would increase the number of [[HIV]] infections.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Van Howe
|first=Robert S.
|init=RS
|author-link=Robert S. Van Howe
|last2=Storms
|first2=Michelle
|init2=M
|author2-link=
|etal=no
|title=How the circumcision solution in Africa will increase HIV infections
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Journal of Public Health in Africa
|location=
|DOI=10.4081/jphia.2011.e4
|accessdate=2021-02-16
}}</ref> [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]] & Boyle (2018) added further critical comment and suggested the possibility of fraud.<ref name="vanhowe2018">{{REFjournal |last=Van Howe |first= |init=RS |author-link=Robert S. Van Howe |last2=Boyle |first2= |init2=GJ |author2-link=Gregory J. Boyle |etal=no |title=Meta-analysis of HIV-acquisition studies incomplete and unstable |journal=BJU Int |date=2018-10-31 |url=https://www.bjuinternational.com/letters/meta-analysis-circumcision-incomplete-unstable/ |quote=Given the effectiveness of condoms, the lack of consistent findings on national levels, the methodologically flawed RCTs, the lack of translational research, and the impressive potential uptake and effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis, circumcision as an intervention to prevent HIV infection should be treated with greater scepticism. |pubmedID= |pubmedCID= |DOI= |accessdate=2022-01-01}}</ref> PEPFAR, however, paid no attention to these warnings and continued to promote the harmful VMMC program.
== Investigations by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) ==
==Recent developments==
[[Michel Garenne |Garenne]] & Matthews (2019) reported that there is little difference in the incidence of [[HIV]] infection between circumcised men and intact men in Zambia. The authors stated that the "effectiveness of VMMC could therefore be seriously questioned."<ref name="garrenne2019">{{REFjournal
|last=Garenne
|first=Michel
|init=M |author-link=Michel Garenne
|last2=Matthews
|first2=Alan
|init2=A
|author2-link=
|etal=no
</center>
<br>
[[George C. Denniston]], {{MD}}, {{MPH}}, the president of [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)| Doctors Opposing Circumcision]], in a letter to Ambassador Deborah L. Birx, {{MD}}, {{MPH}}, dated 29 June 2020, the head of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), has called on PEPFAR to suspend the provision of male [[circumcision]] because it is ineffective and may increase the reception of [[HIV]] infection due to the loss of [[Immunological and protective function of the foreskin| immunological protections]] of the [[foreskin]], and to focus on the provision of anti-retroviral therapy and condoms.<ref name="denniston2020">{{REFdocument
|title=Letter to Deborah L. Birx, M.D.
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2020-06-15b_LettertoPEPFAR.pdf
|last=Denniston
|first=George C.
|publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision(D.O.C.)]]
|format=
|date=2020-06-29
}}</ref></blockquote>
[[George Hill]], CFI, ATR, acting for [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision(D.O.C.)]], wrote to Deborah L. Birx on 28 January 2021 regarding her lack of action and to transmit a copy of the article by Fish et al. (2020).<ref name="hill2021">{{REFdocument
|title=Letter to Deborah L. Birx
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/w/images/2021-01-28A_LetterBirx_516.pdf
|last=Hill
|first=George
|publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision(D.O.C.)]]
|format=PDF
|date=2021-01-28
|accessdate=2021-02-13
}}</ref>
== Population-based studies ==
{{Population-based studies}}
==Two African surveys==
The previously reported studies were from developed Western nations. Now we have information from Sub_Saharan Africa.
 
French scientist [[Michel Garenne]], Ph.D. has published two reports in 2022 comparing the incidence of HIV infection in [[circumcised]] and [[intact]] men.
 
In his first report, Garenne presented the findings from a study in Lesotho, the enclave in South Africa. He reported:
<blockquote>
In couple studies, the effect of circumcision and VMMC on HIV was not significant, with similar transmission from female to male and male to female. The study questions the amount of effort and money spent on VMMC in Lesotho.<ref name="garenne2022A">{{REFjournal
|last=Garenne
|first=Michel
|init=M
|author-link=Michel Garenne
|title=Changing relationships between HIV prevalence and circumcision in Lesotho
|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35373731/
|date=2022-04-04
|journal=J Biosoc Sci
|volume=online ahead of print
|pages=1-16
|DOI=10.1017/S0021932022000153
|pubmedID=35373731
|accessdate=2022-11-04
}}</ref>
</blockquote>
In his second report, Garenne (2022) presented information from six Sub-Saharan African nations (Eswatini, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe). He reported:
<blockquote>
"Results matched earlier observations made in South Africa that [[circumcised]] and [[intact]] men had similar levels of HIV infection."<ref name="garenne2022B">{{REFjournal
|last=Garenne
|first=Michael
|init=M
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Age-incidence and prevalence of HIV among intact and circumcised men: an analysis of PHIA surveys in Southern Africa
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=J Biosoc Sci
|location=
|date=2022-10-26
|season=
|volume=
|issue=
|article=
|page=
|pages=1-13
|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science/article/abs/ageincidence-and-prevalence-of-hiv-among-intact-and-circumcised-men-an-analysis-of-phia-surveys-in-southern-africa/CAA7E7BD5A9844F41C6B7CC3573B9E50
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=36286328
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1017/S0021932022000414
|accessdate=2022-11-04
}}</ref></blockquote>
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Centers for Disease Control|CDC]]
* [[Circumcision and HIV]]
* [[National Institutes of Health|NIH]]
* [[Stop the Cut]]
* [[World Health Organization]]
* [[USAID]]
|url=https://foregen.webflow.io/commentarium-articles/international-contractors-are-profiteering-from-new-circumcision-devices
|title=International Contractors are Profiteering from New Circumcision Devices
|last=[[Foregen ]] Staff
|first=
|author-link=
|publisher=[[Foregen]]
|date=2021-03-08
|accessdate=2021-03-08
}}
* {{URLwebsite|https://www.state.gov/pepfar/|2021-12-31}}
{{ABBR}}
{{REF}}
[[Category:Circumcision in Africa]]
[[Category:Fund]]
[[Category:Program]]
[[Category:Circumcision in Africa]]
[[Category:From CircLeaks]]
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,197
edits

Navigation menu