15,114
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Add text and citation.
|accessdate=2022-09-14
}}</ref> There is substantial evidence that Kilmarx holds a high degree of [[bias]] in favor of [[circumcision]].
Fish et al. (2020) identify Kilmarx as a major architect of the CDC's erroneous circumcision promotion policy with its racist orientation.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Fish
|first=Max
|init=
|author-link=Max Fish
|last2=Shavisi
|first2=Ariane
|init2=
|author2-link=
|last3=Gwaambuka
|first3=Tatenda
|init3=
|author3-link=
|last4=Tangwa
|first4=Godfrey B.
|init4=
|author4-link=
|last5=Ncayiyana
|first5=Daniel
|init5=
|author5-link=
|last6=Earp
|first6=Brian D.
|init6=
|author6-link=Brian D. Earp
|etal=no
|title=A new Tuskegee? Unethical human experimentation and Western neocolonialism in the mass circumcision of African men.
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Dev World Bioeth
|location=
|date=2021-12
|volume=21
|issue=4
|article=
|page=
|pages=211-26
|url=
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=32909369
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1111/dewb.12285
|accessdate=2022-09-27
}}</ref>
{{PUB}}
Kilmarx is a very active writer. He is listed as as author or co-author of [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Peter+Kilmarx 121 articles] by the PubMed service of the National Library of Medicine. Some are very pro-circumcision.