15,375
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Afterword: Add reference.
==Afterword==
The decision of the trial judge was not appealed to a higher court so the decision of the trial court stands.<ref>{{REFnews |title=Judge rules against boy’s circumcision |url=http://www.cirp.org/news/chicagotribune2006-10-24/ |last=Peres |first=Judy |coauthors= |publisher=Chicago Tribune |website= |date=2006-10-24 |accessdate=2020-05-06 |quote=}}</ref>
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] {2006} commented that the ruling protected the boy's legal right to bodily integrity.<ref name="reuters2006" /> Doctors Opposing Circumcision, cited this case as a precedent in an [https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2007-04_BoldtReviewBrief.pdf| ''amicus curiae'' brief] filed with the Oregon Supreme Count in the case of ''[[Boldt v. Boldt]]'' in 2007.