15,261
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revise references.
|accessdate=2020-10-25
|quote=
}}</ref> ==Afterword== The decision of the trial judge was not appealed to a higher court so the decision of the trial court stands.<refname="peres1024">{{REFnews
|title=Judge rules against boy’s circumcision
|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/chicagotribune2006-10-24/
|quote=
}}</ref>
==Afterword==
The decision of the trial judge was not appealed to a higher court so the decision of the trial court stands.<ref name="peres1024" />
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] {2006} commented that the ruling protected the boy's legal right to bodily integrity.<ref name="reuters2006" /> Doctors Opposing Circumcision, cited this case as a precedent in an [https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2007-04_BoldtReviewBrief.pdf| ''amicus curiae'' brief] filed with the Oregon Supreme Count in the case of ''[[Boldt v. Boldt]]'' in 2007.