Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Psychological issues of male circumcision

1,178 bytes added, 01:36, 6 December 2019
Add Grimes (1978)
}}</ref>
</blockquote>
 
Grimes (1978) also expressed concern, writing:
<blockquote>
In contrast to the sometimes dramatic somatic responses of the neonate to operation without anesthesia, the psychological consequences of this trauma are conjectural. Psychoanalyst Erik Erickson has described the first of eight stages of man as the development of basic trust versus basic mistrust. For the baby to be plucked from his bed, strapped in a spread eagle position, and doused with chilling antiseptic is perhaps consistent with other new-found discomforts of extrauterine existence. The application of crushing clamps and excision of penile tissue, however, probably do little to engender a trusting, congenial, relationship with the infants new surroundings.<ref name="grimes1978">{{REFjournal
|last=Grimes
|first=David A.
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Routine circumcision of the newborn: a reappraisal
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Am J Obstet Gynecol
|location=
|date=1978-01-15
|volume=130
|issue=2
|pages=125-9
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/general/grimes/
|quote=
|pubmedID=413435
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1016/0002-9378(78)90353-8
|accessdate=2019-12-05
}}</ref></blockquote>
{{REF}}
17,052
edits

Navigation menu