22,335
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
|trans-title=
|language=
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|DOI=
</blockquote>}}
no edit summary
'''Circumcised doctors''' are those male doctors who were circumcised as infants, so they lack any personal knowledge and experience of a normal male body part – the [[foreskin]] or a complete, functional [[penis]].
LeBourdais (1995) reports the [[circumcision ]] status of the physician is a factor among others in determining if a baby is to be circumcised.<ref name="lebourdais1995">{{REFjournal
|last=LeBourdais
|first=Eleanor
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision no longer a "routine" surgical procedure
|journal=Can Med Assoc J
|location=
|pages=1873-6
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1337997/pdf/cmaj00071-0145.pdf
|pubmedCID=1337997
|accessdate=2020-03-15
}}</ref>
[[Ronald Goldman |Goldman]] (1999) reports circumcised doctors will write papers to support non-therapeutic circumcision:<blockquote>{{Citation |Text=One reason that flawed studies are published is that science is affected by cultural values. A principal method of preserving cultural values is to disguise them as truths that are based on scientific research. This 'research' can then be used to support questionable and harmful cultural values such as circumcision. This explains the claimed medical 'benefits' of circumcision. |Author=[[Ronald Goldman]] |ref=<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Goldman
|first=Ronald
|accessdate=2020-03-15
}}</ref>
{{SEEALSO}}
*[[Adamant father syndrome]]