15,638
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Add Briefs section.
|accessdate=2020-05-08
}}
==Briefs==
The two briefs indexed here were filed by [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] with the Oregon Supreme Court in the case of [[Boldt v. Boldt]], where they proved instrumental in changing the direction of that case. They have an excellent summary of American Constitutional law relevant to the non-therapeutic circumcision of male children.
* {{REFdocument
|title=BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE, DOCTORS OPPOSING CIRCUMCISION, IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITION FOR REVIEW
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2007-04_BoldtReviewBrief.pdf
|contribution=
|last=Geisheker
|first=John V.
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision
|format=PDF
|date=2007-04
|accessdate=2020-05-10
}}
* {{REFdocument
|title=BRIEF ON THE MERITS OF ''AMICUS CURIAE'', DOCTORS OPPOSING CIRCUMCISION
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2007-07-31_BoldtAmicusBriefMerits.pdf
|contribution=
|last=Geisheker
|first=John
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision
|format=PDF
|date=2007-07
|accessdate=2020-05-10
}}</ref>
{{LINKS}}