22,190
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Bullying techniques
== Bullying techniques ==
Chances are that discussions about the [[MGM]] topic culminate in an exchange of unkindness. There is no tendency to determine whether intactivists [[intactivist]]s or circumcision advocats have started to escalatea discussion; people and situations are too different for thatand each person has other trigger words to react on. But there are samples which often repeat and are used by circumcision advocats onlymostly, especially when they can no longer stand up argumentatively.
{{Incomplete}}
* Accuse the opponent as being anti-Semitic.
* Accuse the opponent as being islamophob.
* Attack ''ad hominem'', i.e. attack the discussion partner personally, not speaking about the topic (''ad rem'').
* Cite [[arguments pro circumcision]] that have long since been refuted.
* Claim that inactivists are not about children's rights.
* Claim that intactivists are pedophile.
* Focus on the child's penis, not on his human rights.
* Give names.
* Insist on [[arguments pro circumcision|circumcision myths ]] which are already debunked by science or testemonies.
* Name intactivism a "cult".
* Ridicule all arguments of the opponent, without counter arguments.