Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Position statements on infant circumcision

246 bytes added, 03:25, 1 July 2020
American Academy of Pediatrics: Change title, improve quotation.
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/commentary-on-american-academy-of-pediatrics-2012-circumcision-policy-statement.pdf
|archived=
|title=Medical Organization StatementsCommentary on American Academy of Pediatrics2012 Circumcision Policy Statement
|trans-title=
|language=English
|accessdate=2020-06-28
|format=
|quote=To increase The 2012 Circumcision Policy Statement was created by a team put together for the income specific purpose of their members (whom protecting the goose that lays golden eggs for the AAP calls ‘fellows’), these American medical associations are willing to put healthy American boys under industry. None of the members had any specific expertise in circumcision knife and expose them all to their document suggests they knew little or nothing about the risks anatomy and utility of any surgerythe human foreskin. They claimed to have studied voluminous literature, but ignored older and the unique risks, harmsmore useful studies, and losses of circumcision itselfcherry-picked the medical oeuvre.
}}</ref> an association of European doctors,<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Frisch
15,969
edits

Navigation menu