Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision legal commentary

391 bytes added, 17:47, 29 July 2020
Add Miller paper.
==Commentaries==
 
T. L. Fisher (1966), an officer of the [https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/en/home Canadian Medical Protective Association], discussed the legal dangers of using outmoded treatment. This is, of course, relevant to the outmoded practice of circumcision of male children.
* {{REFjournal
Sebastian Poulter (1986) argues argued that parents may authorise the non-therapeutic circumcision of a male minor under English law. Later British court decisions call his comments into question.
* {{REFbook
|last=Poulter
[[Charles A. Bonner|Bonner]] & Kinane (1989) discuss discussed the legal and constitutional issues of non-therapeutic male circumcision under United States and California law.
* {{REFjournal
|last=Bonner
|accessdate=2020-05-08
}}
 
Giannetti (2000) argues that scientific misconduct in the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] circumcision policy statements should expose the AAP to trade association liability.
Peter W. Edge (2000) discusses discussed the impact of the Human Rights Act (1998) on the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision of male children in the United Kingdom.
* {{REFjournal
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/edge1/
|accessdate=2020-05-10
}}
 
 
Geoffrey P. Miller (2002) discussed the impact of American culture on the law of circumcision.
 
* {{REFjournal
|last=Miller
|first=Geoffrey
|author-link=
|title=Circumcision: Cultural-Legal Analysis
|journal=Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law.
|date=2002-3
|volume=9
|issue=
|pages=497-585
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/miller1/
|accessdate=2020-07-29
}}
|accessdate=2020-05-13
}}
 
==Briefs==
15,638
edits

Navigation menu