Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision study flaws

1,066 bytes added, 14:01, 3 August 2020
USA: Add text
|accessdate=2020-08-03
}}
 
* {{REFjournal
|last=Frisch
|first=Morten
|author-link=
|last2=Aigran
|first2=Yves
|author2-link=
|last3=Barauskas
|first3=Vidmantas
|author3-link=
|last4=
|first4=
|author4-link=
|last5=
|first5=
|author5-link=
|last6=
|first6=
|author6-link=
|last7=
|first7=
|author7-link=
|last8=
|first8=
|author8-link=
|last9=
|first9=
|author9-link=
|etal=yes
|title=Cultural bias in the AAP’s 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on male circumcision
|trans-title=
|language=English
|journal=Pediatrics
|location=
|date=2013-04-01
|volume=131
|issue=4
|pages=796-800
|url=http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/early/2013/03/12/peds.2012-2896.full.pdf
|archived=
|quote=Cultural bias reflecting the normality of nontherapeutic male circumcision in the United States seems obvious. The conclusions of the AAP Technical Report and Policy Statement are far from those reached by physicians in most other Western countries.
|pubmedID=23509170
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1542/peds.2012-2896
|accessdate=2020-08-03}}
* {{REFweb
15,564
edits

Navigation menu