Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

R. W. Cockshut

444 bytes added, 23:44, 29 December 2020
m
adjusted REFjournal
|Text=I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is "against nature", but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the [[glans]] of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than skin. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his penis much less often. I am convinced that [[masturbation]] is much less common in the circumcised. With these considerations in view it does not seem apt to argue that 'God knows best how to make little boys.'<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Cockshut
|firstinit=RW |author-link=R. W. Cockshut
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision
|trans-title=
|language=English
|journal=BMJ
|location=
{{PUB}}
* [{{REFjournal |url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13146787 |title=The minor maladies of children] |last=Cockshut |init=RW |author-link=R. W. Cockshut |journal=Trans Med Soc Lond |date=1953 |volume=69 |pages=71-9; discussion, 79-84 |pubmedID=13146787 |accessdate=2020-12-29}}* [{{REFjournal |url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20777873 SOME OBSERVATIONS ON WHOOPINGCOUGH AND ITS TREATMENT BY VACCINES] |title=Some Observations on Whoopingcough and Its Treatment by Vaccines |last=Cockshut |init=RW |author-link=R. W. Cockshut |journal=Br Med J |date=1933-11-04 |volume=2 |issue=3800 |pages=819-20 |DOI=10.1136/bmj.2.3800.819 |pubmedID=20777873 |pubmedCID=2369554 |accessdate=2020-12-29}}
{{REF}}
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu