Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sex As Nature Intended It

105 bytes added, 09:35, 7 July 2021
m
wikify AG and CC
== Critics ==
The [[circumcision advocate]] website [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice ]] debunked the flaws and bias of O'Hara's study which is the basis of this book. While most of the counter-arguments by [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice ]] seem to be valid, the refutation itself also uses wordings which expose the biased view pro circumcision of the ostensibly anonymous author of the refutation which seems to be [[Andrew Gross]].<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/ohara
|title=Sex as the researcher intended it
|first=Andrew
|last=Gross
|author-link=Andrew Gross
|website=Circumcision Choice
|date=2018-04
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,226
edits

Navigation menu