Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wikipedia bias on circumcision

385 bytes added, 16:32, 29 July 2021
Circumcision related articles: add Alexbrn.
: Male circumcision has a substantial list of harms, complications, disadvantages, and drawbacks, however Jake apparently wanted these to be minimized while the alleged advantages were emphasized. This put him into conflict with others who wanted the whole story to be told. As a result, there were a huge number of revisions to the articles associated with male circumcision until 18 June 2012,<ref name="circhistory2001" /> when Jake resigned from editing.
* [[James Heilman]], a Canadian circumcision enthusiast, is another administrator noted for [[bias]] in favor of non-therapeutic circumcision. Heilman, under the name "Doc James", made his first edit to the circumcision article on 1 June 2011.<ref name="circhistory2001" /> Thereafter, he co-edited with Jake Waskett until Waskett resigned a year later. Heilman made a very large number of edits to the Circumcision article and to related articlesto maintain the pro-circumcision bias, but he made his last edit on 11 May 2020.<ref name="circhistory2001" />Heilman awarded two "Barnstars" to a long-time user who identifies himself as "Alexbrn".<ref name="Alexbrn2021">{{REFweb |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alexbrn |title=User:Alexbrn |last= |first= |accessdate=2021-07-29}}</ref> * Alexbrn appears to have taken over the duties of regulating the various circumcision related articles.
{{REF}}
15,755
edits

Navigation menu