22,307
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
enhanced YT link REF
* Freedom rights do not allow any harmful interference in the body of other fundamental rights holders.
* The essence of the right to freedom is the arbitrariness of the execution of the action.
* If the rights of the child had to give way to the pure arbitrariness (!) Of the other, they would not be "rights".<<ref>{{REFweb |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpGNIgLXLfI |title=Dr. Jörg Scheinfeld; Symposium: Genitale Autonomie [7/11] |trans-title=Dr. Jörg Scheinfeld; Symposium: Genital Autonomy [7/11] |language=German |website=YouTube |date=2014-06-04 |accessdate=2021-08-25}}</ref>
=== Merkel ===
[[Reinhard Merkel]], Prof. for criminal law and member of the ethics council, explained in his essay "The Skin of the Other" why it is nonsense to claim that the religious freedom of the parents allows to cut something off from the body of the son.