17,052
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Late twentieth century: Add text and links.
|accessdate=2021-10-10
}}</ref>
The statement, which was intended to promote the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision for the benefit of the fellows of the AAP, had many serious deficiences. Some more notable deficiences included:
* failure to recognize the child as a person with legal rights to bodily integrity.
* failure to provide information on the nature and functions of the human [[foreskin]].
* failure to call for analgesia to ease the intense [[pain]] of the amputation.
* inclusion of Thomas E. Wiswell's methodologically-flawed papers on [[urinary tract infection]] (UTI).
* failure to inform parents that UTI is properly treated with antibiotics.
* use of the misleading word ''potential'' to describe speculative medical benefits that do not actually exist.
* attempting to shift responsibility for the performance of an injurious and harmful amputation from the medical operator to the parents.
{{REF}}
[[Category:USA]]