Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision legal commentary

259 bytes added, 14:27, 20 October 2021
m
wikify Robert S. Van Howe and others
}}
* [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]], [[J. Steven Svoboda|Svoboda]], [[James G. Dwyer|Dywer]], & [[Christopher P. Price|Price ]] (1999), a medico-legal team discuss the legal issues of non-therapeutic circumcision of boys.
: {{REFjournal
|last=Van Howe
}}
* [[J. Steven Svoboda|Svoboda]], [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe ]] & [[James G. Dwyer|Dwyer ]] (2000) discuss legal issues inherent with consent for non-therapeutic circumcision of boys.
: {{REFjournal
|last=Svoboda
|accessdate=2020-05-13
}}
* [[J. Steven Svoboda|Svoboda]], [[Peter W. Adler|Adler]], and [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe ]] point out that physicians have a legal duty to protect children from unnecessary interventions. They suggest that under existing United States law and international human rights declarations as well, circumcision already violates boys´ absolute rights to equal protection, bodily integrity, autonomy, and freedom to choose their own religion.
: {{REFjournal
|last=Svoboda
}}
* [[Peter W. Adler|Adler]], [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]], Wisdom & Daase (2020) examined male non-therapeutic circumcision as fraud.
: {{REFjournal
|last=Adler
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu