22,335
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
wikify HIV
The [http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_0751-0800/ab_768_bill_20110707_amended_sen_v96.html new law] attempts to dictate the medical validity of circumcision, declaring that ''"Male circumcision has a wide array of health and affiliative benefits,"'' and that thus ''"No local statute, ordinance, or regulation, or administrative action implementing a local statute, ordinance, or regulation shall prohibit or restrict the practice of male circumcision, or the exercise of parental authority with respect to the same."'' It is being presented as an ''"urgency bill necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety,"'' where, if signed into law, would take effect immediately.
By codifying statements that no medical organization in and outside of the United States has ever dared to make, Gatto's law takes an unfounded position against the best medical authorities of the West, within and outside of the United States. The trend of opinion on routine male circumcision is so overwhelmingly negative in industrialized nations that it would be quite surprising were male circumcision to be recommended in the United States. No respected U.S. based medical board recommends circumcision for U.S. infants, not even in the name of [[HIV ]] prevention. They all point to the risks, and they all state that there is no convincing evidence that the benefits outweigh these risks.
== Hypocrisy ==