Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Psychological issues of male circumcision

91 bytes added, 12:21, 26 November 2021
m
REFbook uses <init> key
|last=Maimonides
|first=Moses
|author-linkinit=M |last2= |first2= |author2author-link=Moses Maimonides
|year=1963
|title=The Guide of the Perplexed
|last=Ramos
|first=Samuel
|init=S
|author-link=
|last2=Boyle
|first2=GregoryJ. |init2=GJ |author2-link=Gregory J. Boyle
|year=2001
|title=Ritual and medical circumcision among Filipino boys: evidence of post-traumatic stress disorder
|first=Lindsay R.
|init=LR
|author-link=Lindsay R. Watson
|last2=Golden
|first2=Tom
|last=Watson
|first=Lindsay R.
|init=LR
|author-link=Lindsay R. Watson
|year=2014
|title=[[Unspeakable Mutilations]]
|url=
|pages=
|DOI=10.1136/bmj.316.7137.1086
|accessdate=2019-12-10
}}</ref> Unfortunately, Watson & Goldman Golden (2017) report:
<blockquote>
We found that therapists were reluctant to accept that the grief was real, were unaware of foreskin functions, denied circumcision had physical or psychological sequelae and minimized patient grief using humor, cultural aesthetics, controversial
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu