Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision study flaws

285 bytes removed, 06:52, 31 December 2021
m
using template:RCT Bailey et al 2007
}}</ref> so there is intense interest in keeping the Goose alive. [[Third-party payment]] is frequently available in the United States.
Several state Medicaid programs stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision in the early in the 21st Century. It is believed that this caused alarm in the circumcision industry. Shortly after ''The Lancet'' published two reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from sub-Saharan Africa,<ref name="bailey2007">{{REFjournal |last=RCT Bailey |init=RC |author-link=Robert C. Bailey |last2=Moses |init2=S |last3=Parker |init3=CB |etal=yes |title=Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: A randomised controlled trial |journal=Lancet |date=et al 2007 |volume=369 |issue=9562 |pages=643–656}}</ref><ref name="gray2007">{{REFjournal
|last=Gray
|init=RH
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu