Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Daniel T. Halperin

1,757 bytes added, 16:14, 28 June 2022
Revise text; Add Population section; Wikify.
|}
'''Daniel T. Halperin''' has published several papers on [[circumcision ]] for [[HIV]] prevention,<ref>{{REFweb
|last=PubMed
|first=NCBI
|url= http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Daniel%20Halperin%20circumcision
|accessdate=2011-04-29
}}</ref> which are being used by the [[WHO|World Health Organization]] to endorse circumcision as an [[HIV]] prevention method. In November 1999, colleagues Daniel Halperin and [[Robert C. Bailey]] published an article in the ''Lancet '' criticizing the public-health community for not pushing circumcision. Today, Halperin is the Senior Research Scientist at the Harvard AIDS Prevention Research Project.<ref>{{REFweb
|last=Halperin
|first=Daniel
|url=http://www.circumcisioninformation.com/halperin_inverview1.htm
|accessdate=2011-05-07
}}</ref> Halperin's home office is was only a stone's throw from the office of the late [[Edgar J. Schoen]] (leading pro-circumcision advocate).<ref name=Slack2000/>
== Religious & cultural bias ==
- His grandfather was a Mohel[[mohel]], born in Russia, died in Chicago. "I don't have an agenda about [[Foreskin| foreskins]]" said Halperin in an interview for the ''Eastbay Express''. When asked if being Jewish affects his [[Bias|pro-circumcision bias]], he denied it, but said that his [[Judaism ]] has "crept in now and then". He explains, "think of it as maybe a kind of health/cultural innovation ahead of it's time. So it's made me appreciate my own heritage more. And who knows, maybe finding out to my surprise that my own granddad was a Mohel was a weird kind of confirmation that I'm maybe in some small way 'destined' to help pass along this health benefit to people in parts of the world where it could really make a difference and perhaps save many lives." <ref name=Slack2000>{{REFjournal
|last=Slack
|first=Gordy
|url=http://www.circumcisioninformation.com/halperin_inverview1.htm
|accessdate=2011-05-07
}}</ref> It is important to note that Quaintance and Morris are both proud members and promoters of [[Gilgal Society]] and [[Circlist]], which openly admit to a morbid fascination with [[circumcision ]] to the point of sado-masochistic fetish. Morris has included CircList as a resource in a recent paper,<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Morris
|first=Brian J.
{{Citation
|Title=
|Text=No. At least it didn't during the first couple of years I was doing research. I didn't think about the Jewish part at all. I'd vaguely heard about a guy in Boston who does a non-cutting ritual bris, and maybe that would have appealed to me, if I had a boy someday. But in recent years the Judaism aspect has crept in now and then. Some [non-Jewish and typically [[uncircumcised]]] doctors, for example, an oncologist in northeastern Brazil who has to amputate cancerous penises every week, would tell me not knowing that I was Jewish, 'Those Jews were so smart; thousands of years ago they figured out this way to prevent health problems.' That was one of the things that began to spin my head around from thinking of this as a savage ritual from the dark past to thinking of it as maybe a kind of health/cultural innovation ahead ofits of its time... So I guess it has made me appreciate my own heritage more. And who knows, maybe finding out to my surprise that my own granddad was an occasional [[mohel ]] was a weird kind of confirmation that I'm maybe in some small way 'destined' to help pass along this health benefit to people in parts of the world where it could really make a difference and perhaps save many lives.
|Author=Daniel Halperin
|Source=
{{Citation
|removeTitle=
|Text=It's as if you went to a lung-cancer resource center and they had nothing at all about cigarettes. What the hell is going on? Why is everyone ignoring the elephant-sized [[foreskin ]] in the living room?
|Author=Daniel Halperin
|Source=Express Online
|ref=<ref name=Slack2000/>
}}
 
==Population-based studies==
 
September 2021 saw the publication of two huge population studies on the relationship of [[circumcision]] and HIV infection:
 
# Mayan et al. (2021) carried out a massive empirical study of the male population of the province of Ontario, [[Canada]] (569,950 males), of whom 203,588 (35.7%) were [[circumcised]] between 1991 and 2017. The study concluded that circumcision status is not related to risk of HIV infection.<ref name="mayan2021">{{REFjournal
|last=Mayan
|first=Madhur
|init=M
|author-link=
|last2=Hamilton
|first2=Robert J.
|init2=RJ
|author2-link=
|last3=Juurlink
|first3=David N.
|init3=DN
|author3-link=
|last4=Austin
|first4=Peter C.
|init4=PC
|author4-link=
|last5=Jarvi
|first5=Keith A.
|init5=KA
|author5-link=
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision and Risk of HIV Among Males From Ontario, Canada
|journal=J Urol
|date=2021-09-23
|url=https://www.auajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1097/JU.0000000000002234
|quote=We found that circumcision was not independently associated with the risk of acquiring HIV among men from Ontario, Canada.
|pubmedID=34551593
|DOI=10.1097/JU.0000000000002234
|accessdate=2021-10-02
}}</ref>
# [[Morten Frisch]] & Jacob Simonsen (2021) carried out a large scale empirical population study in [[Denmark]] of 855,654 males regarding the alleged value of male circumcision in preventing HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in men. They found that [[circumcised]] men have a higher rate of STI and HIV infection overall than [[intact]] men.<ref name="frisch2021">{{FrischM SimonsenJ 2021}}</ref>
 
No association between lack of circumcision and risk of HIV infection was found by either study.
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Bias]]
* [[Circlist]] -- Halperin endorses [[Circlist]].
* [[Gilgal Society]] -- Halperin helped create a [[Gilgal]] brochure.
16,980
edits

Navigation menu