Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Feminism and genital integrity

5 bytes added, 07:53, 10 August 2022
m
typo
Feminists attempt to secure the right to choice for women and girls. Feminism is supposed to offer change for women and men, and a way to conceptualize sexism and injustices with an objective to resist and combat these phenomena. Men are silenced and invalidated while feminism belittles their experiences as victims of male genital mutilation by not extending the same articulations of this gendered practice as it has for women.
The origin of feminist theory lies in a vision for change. Among the vision is securing choice that will better women’s lives. Male [[circumcision]] should also be questioned and awareness should be raised of the benefits of intact genitalia, as well as appreciation for the intact body as natural and beautiful.<ref name="wisdom2012" /> These two philosophies seem to contradict each other, because [[intactivism]] calls for choice and protection from unwanted genital surgeries, regardless of gender; and feminism seems to only be interested in securing choice for females. It is a [[^ double standard]] against boys and men and feminists need to reconsider.
Feminism is very relevant to this issue. Both the feminist and [[intactivist]] movements disrupt dominant discourses that are taken for granted, the most basic assumptions of the ways in which our society functions. These discourses articulate meanings of sexuality, health, and reproduction, and as with the discourses surrounding female sexuality, they can be damaging to women. The discourses that surround males are damaging to their sexuality and their bodies, as they promote genital surgery that amputates the epicenter of their pleasure and sensation, and that rids their genitals of protection, denying the the same right of body ownership that Americans ethnocentrically secure for females.<ref name="wisdom2012" /> According to feminism, men benefit most from gender privilege, but they are also oppressed and victimized by its ideologies and by sexist exploitation. If gender inequality exists against males whereby we are marginalized and their lives are jeopardized, why wouldn’t feminism offer critical analyses for positive social change as intended to better women’s lives by eradicating all forms of sexism?
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu