Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision

8 bytes added, 14:46, 25 August 2022
m
wikify Informed consent
=== Scandinavia ===
In 2013 children's ombudsmen from Sweden, Norway, Finland, [[Denmark]], and Iceland, along with the Chair of the Danish Children's Council and the children's spokesperson for Greenland, passed a resolution that emphasized the decision to be circumcised should belong to the individual, who should be able to give [[informed consent]].<ref name="resolution2">{{REFweb
|last=Nordic Association of Children's Ombudsmen
|title=Let the boys decide for themselves
}}</ref>
[[Margaret A. Somerville|Somerville]] argues that because of a lack of credible information about male circumcision in some societies, the ability for the caregiver to grant [[informed consent ]] on behalf of their child is compromised. This may be especially true of caregivers from a religious or cultural tradition that is particularly biased towards or against circumcising infants.<ref name="Somerville2000"/>
Canning (2002) commented that "[i]f circumcision becomes less commonly performed in North America ... the legal system may no longer be able to ignore the conflict between the practice of circumcision and the legal and ethical duties of medical specialists."<ref name="Canning">{{REFjournal
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,208
edits

Navigation menu