17,165
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→The American Urological Association: Add text and citation.
When drafting this statement, it is evident that the AUA placed the income of its members above the legal rights, health, and well-being of American boys.
For comparison, the [[Canadian Urological Association]] (CUA) considered the matter of non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]] and issued a statement in February 2018. The CUA concluded:
{{Citation
|Text=Given the socioeconomic, educational status, and health demographics of our population, universal neonatal circumcision cannot be justified based on the current evidence available.
|ref=<ref name="cua2018">{{REFjournal
|last=Dave
|first=Sumit
|init=S
|author-link=
|etal=yes
|title=Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (abridged version)
|journal=Can Urol Assoc J
|location=
|date=2018-02
|volume=12
|issue=2
|pages=18-28
|url=https://cuaj.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/5034/3470
|quote=
|pubmedID=29381455
|pubmedCID=5937397
|DOI=10.5489/cuaj.5034. Epub 2017 Dec 1
|accessdate=2023-04-10
}}</ref>
|author=[[Canadian Urological Association]]
}}
Every circumcision causes both psychic and physical [[trauma]] to the patient. Svoboda (2017) considered whether the benefits of non-therapeutic circumcision (NTC) was sufficient to justify the trauma. He wrote:
}}</ref>
</blockquote>
==Issues with care of intact males==
Intactiwiki is aware of a steady flow of inquiries and complaints from [[foreskinned]] males who have consulted unnamed urologists for one reason or another.