Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Statement on foreskin circumcision

4 bytes added, 15:27, 19 June 2023
m
wikify stretching
[[Circumcision]]s of the genitals — except those medically strictly indicated — are neither 'natural' for boys nor for girls, why they represent bodily injuries in both cases, regardless of their (in turn always individually and therefore subjectively) perceived or defined severity.
Worldwide, tens of thousands men deal with the so-called "[[Restoration|restoring]]", which means the recovery of their [[foreskin]] by [[stretching ]] the remaining penis [[skin]] for years. Alone the two most important suppliers, TLC and DTR, send approximately 6,500 units annually, according to their own disclosures; adding about 10 new customers per day. Do all these men take these years of torture on themselves, though they are all happy and satisfied with their situation? THE FACT that around 70% of the Germans refuse the regulation of the circumcision practice by [[German Circumcision Act|§ 1631d BGB]] should give pause to anyone who thinks [[circumcision]]is something quite harmless, self-evident, normal.
We welcome the [[Circumcision Debate|public discussion]] on the relevance of "[[circumcision]]" of boys who cannot consent as a completely normal and wanted thing for a democratic state, that serves to exchange experiences and knowledge, the opinion of the population and hopefully soon also that of their representatives. NORMAL and NATURAL is the not injured, healthy, intact [[penis]]. Who claims or suggests to his children something else, lies to his children and possibly themselves. Who as a [[circumcised]] man subjectively does not feel as hurt and finds no disadvantages or limitations, may be lucky. Men who suffer from their disadvantages and limitations and speak publicly on these, should receive the empathy and understanding that they deserve.
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,328
edits

Navigation menu