Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

American urologists and the practice of male circumcision

22 bytes removed, 17:56, 17 August 2023
m
wikify balanoposthitis
* This statement claims that non-therapeutic circumcision is safe "when performed by an experienced operator", however, infant circumcision is frequently assigned to the most junior and least-experienced operator.
* This statement claims that circumcision prevents [[phimosis]] and [[paraphimosis]], however, these are normal developmental conditions and not diseases.
* This statement claims that circumcision prevents [[Balanitis| balanoposthitis]], however, the treatment for this inflammation depends on accurate diagnosis of the cause, followed by appropriate treatment.
* This statement claims that circumcision reduces [[urinary tract infection]] (UTI) by 90 percent, but it ignores the immunological functions of the [[intact]] foreskin.<ref>{{FleissP HodgesF VanHoweRS 1998}}</ref> The proper treatment for UTI is anti-microbial, not surgery.<ref name="McCracken 1989">{{REFjournal
|last=McCracken
* This statement claims that circumcision reduces the risk of HIV infection in Africa by 60 percent, however, the RCTs on which is based have been shown to have disabling statistical faults with only a 1 percent reduction at best.<ref>{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref>
* This statement proposes [[circumcision]] as a treatment for [[phimosis]] in boys, however, makes no mention of the effectiveness of non-invasive manual [[stretching]] to relieve phimosis and paraphimosis.
* This statement proposes circumcision as a treatment for [[Balanitis| balanoposthitis]], but fails to mention conservative, non-invasive, accurate diagnosis of the cause and specific appropriate treatment as a better alternative.<ref name="edwards1996">{{REFjournal
|last=Edwards
|first=Sarah
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu