Changes

Presenting this hypothesis presents a two-fold problem. First, it presents an irrelevant conclusion; the randomized control trials were measuring frequency in [[HIV]] transmission, not for frequency in penile bacterial inflamationinflammation, and whether said inflamation inflammation facilitated sexually transmitted [[HIV]]. And secondly, circumcision advocates give themselves the new burden of proving the newly introduced hypothesis, that change in bacterial infection does indeed result in a significant reduction of [[HIV]] transmission. A new study is needed to measure [[HIV]] transmission in men who have been [[circumcised]], [[intact ]] men with constant penile inflamationsinflammations, and [[intact ]] men who don't suffer constant penile inflammation. Unless the randomized controlled studies were limited to only [[intact ]] men who suffered constant penile inflammation.