Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Intactivism

8 bytes added, 12:09, 18 August 2019
m
Female genital mutilation
When the American Academy of Pediatrics in 2010 suggested that "pricking or incising the clitoral skin" was a harmless procedure that might satisfy parents, intactivist organizations and individuals were quick to respond in condemning the "policy statement on ritual genital cutting of female minors".
While the intactivist movement at large recognizes all forms of female genital mutilation as harmful, some of the organizations leading the campaigns against FGM do not recognize any harm in male circumcision. In fact, Catherine Hankins, a circumcision promoter who works for the [[WHO|World Health Organization]], wrote: "it is therefore critical that messaging about male circumcision for HIV prevention not only clearly distinguishes it from FGM but also contributes to efforts to eradicate FGM".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_Against_Female_Genital_Mutilation
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu