16,983
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Articles: Add article.
==Introduction==
The [[circumcision industry]] would like parents and the public to believe that [[circumcision]] is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of [[informed consent]] typically excludes any discussion of the psychological [[trauma]], injury, and emotional effects of circumcision.<refname="tye2023"> {{REFjournal |last=Tye |first= |init=MC |author-link= |last2=Sardi |first2= |init2=LM |author2-link= |etal=no |title=Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision |trans-title= |language= |journal=Int J Impot Res |location= |date=2023-05 |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=242-8 |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-022-00553-9 |archived= |quote=Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics. |pubmedID=35347302 |DOI=10.1038/s41443-022-00553-9 |accessdate=2024-06-22}}</ref>
Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.
|accessdate=2024-06-22
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Prescott
|first=
|init=JW
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Body pleasure and the origins of violence.
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=The Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists
|location=
|date=1975-11
|volume=
|issue=
|article=
|page=
|pages=10-20
|url=http://www.violence.de/prescott/bulletin/article.html
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|doi=
|accessdate=2024-06-22
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Richards
|first=
|init=MPM
|author-link=
|last2=Bernal
|first2=
|init2=JF
|author2-link=
|last3=Brackbill
|first3=
|init3=Y
|author3-link=
|etal=no
|title=Early behavioral differences: gender or circumcision?
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Dev Psychobiol
|location=
|date=1976-01
|volume=9
|issue=1
|pages=89-95
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/psych/brackbill/
|archived=
|quote=We have reported here some direct and indirect evidence indicating that circumcision has an influence of unknown duration on the behavior and psychophysiology of male infants and we suggest that so-called neonatal "gender" differences may instead be circumcision differences.
|pubmedID=767183
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1002/dev.420090112
|accessdate=2024-06-22
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Aydogmus
|issue=3
|pages=242-8
|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-022-00553-9
|archived=
|quote=Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
}}
{{REF}}
[[Category:Circumcision]]
[[Category:Male sexuality]]
[[Category:Psychology]]
[[Category:Trauma]]