22,197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Removing foreskin no protection for American men of color, study finds
| accessdate=2012-10-02
}}</ref> Screenshot <ref>Archive (2012-10-02): [http://pool.intactiwiki.org/index.php/File:MSNBC.PDFArchive (2012-10-02)]</ref>
The same article (or an article with the same title) is still available in Reuters<ref>{{REFnews
| url=http://healthyliving.msn.com/?cp-documentid=100157237#scpti2
| accessdate=
}}</ref> Screenshot <ref>Archive (2012-10-02): [http://pool.intactiwiki.org/index.php/File:Langerin.pdfArchive (2012-10-02)]</ref>
However, again the information is still available in other places:<REF>{{REFnews
| pages=147-55
| url=
| pubmedID=16226431
| accessdate=
| doi = 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2005.08.009| PMID = 16226431
}}</ref>, and this concept is one of the reasons behind the hypothesis that [http://intactipedia.org/index.php?title=Circumcision_and_HIV circumcision may reduce the risk of a male becoming infected with HIV from a female partner]. This Dutch study contradicts this idea, by stating that the Langerhans cells block HIV<ref name="de Witte-2007">{{REFjournal
| last=de Witte
| pages=367-71
| url=
| pubmedID=17334373
| accessdate=
| doi = 10.1038/nm1541| PMID = 17334373
}}</ref>.